In the global study, published in the New England Journal of Medicine, 424 patients at seven sites in Vietnam, Mongolia, South Africa and Ethiopia were randomly assigned to a treatment programme, with around a third of patients going on the long regimen and two thirds going on the short regimen.
The study found that the nine-to-11 month programme was just as effective as the longer version. The results showed that 78.8 per cent of patients on the shorter course were still free of TB two and a half years after the end of the treatment, compared to 79.9 per cent on the longer programme.
The study also found that patients who were HIV positive had just as good outcomes on the short programme as on the long programme.
Researchers from the Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine are currently looking at the cost effectiveness of the shorter treatment period.
Paula Fujiwara, scientific director of the International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, said the trial was good news in that it provided vital evidence of the short programme’s effectiveness.
“Analysis of the cost effectiveness is ongoing but the initial idea is that of course the shorter programme will be cheaper. When you take medicine for nine months instead of 24 months the costs will go down. One of the key goals of the [WHO] Stop TB strategy is that patients will avoid catastrophic costs and we hope that the analysis will show this,” she said.
The study found that the long regime actually performed a lot better under clinical trial conditions than it usually does – the longer regimen has a 50 per cent effectiveness rate usually, compared to nearly 80 per cent in the trial.
However, in observational studies – where patients are treated in real world conditions – the shorter regimen performed just as well as in the randomised control trial, suggesting that the shorter regimen is actually more effective than the longer one.